Negotiated formality: analysis of the “written modification only” agreement

Authors

  • Davi Guimarães Mendes Universidade 7 de Setembro (UNI7)

Abstract

The requirement that modifications to a contract must occur in writing is a common provision in instruments adopted in various contractual relationships. However, it is doubtful what legal qualification this type of agreement holds, and, more importantly, what consequences arise from its non-compliance. This paper holds that agreements requiring written form for contractual amendments fall within the broader category of conventional agreements, the regulation of which dates back to Roman law and has been categorized in European common law, extending to contemporary legal systems of the Romano-Germanic tradition, each attributing different effects to such agreements. It is contended that, in light of the current legal framework in Brazil, conventional agreements, and consequently, agreements requiring written form for contractual amendments, establish formal validity requirements, the non-compliance of which results in the nullity of the agreement in which the conventional formality was not observed.

Author Biography

Davi Guimarães Mendes, Universidade 7 de Setembro (UNI7)

Doutor e Mestre em Direito Civil pela Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de São Paulo (USP). Professor da Graduação e do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito do Centro Universitário 7 de Setembro (UNI7). Advogado.

Published

2025-07-30

How to Cite

Guimarães Mendes, D. (2025). Negotiated formality: analysis of the “written modification only” agreement . Revista Brasileira De Direito Civil, 34(1), 109–134. Retrieved from https://rbdcivil.ibdcivil.org.br/rbdc/article/view/1029